In Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 829 of 2017, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed the appeal as infructuous because the appellant's counsel submitted that the underlying suit had already been disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 829 OF 2017 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI H B RAJARAM S/O LATE DODDABYANNA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT HULIMAVU VILLAGE BEGUR HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560 076 …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S R HEGDE HUDLAMANE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka
R2 TO R11 ARE RESIDINETS OF NO.24,SUBBAIAHANAPALYA BANASVADI ROAD, BANGALORE-560 033.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKARA N.,ADVOCATE FOR R1: SRI. OMKARA MURTHY G, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R11)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED:13.01.17 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN O.S.NO.1785/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE LIX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, & C/c OF X ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
& SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, REJECTING I.A.NO.1 FILED U/O 39 RULE 1 & 2 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 21.11.2023 stating that the suit itself has
been disposed of and the appeal does not survive for consideration.
infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
CM
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 39
Sri H B Rajaram
Sri C Lakshminaravana
H.T. Narendra Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
