Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sri Raju Vs M/S Navakar — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Karnataka HC (2023)

Home
Karnataka HC
2023
Sri Raju Vs M/S NavakarSri Raju v. M/S Navakar

Dismissed

Sri Raju v. M/S Navakar

Karnataka HC7 Dec 2023MFA/7726/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Miscellaneous First Appeal regarding temporary injunction dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear.

What did the court decide?

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:44424 MFA No. 7726 of 2019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 7^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7726 OF 2019 (CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI RAJU S/O SRI PONNA PUJARI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/A NO.9-4/2, 6TH CROSS MASJID ROAD,OLD OKALIPURAM BENGALURU-560021

…APPELLANT (BY SRI.MUKESH K.V ., ADVOCATE AND SRI. M. SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:

Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka

M/S NAVAKAR REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.22/1, MADARSAB LANE COTTONPET BENGALURU-560053 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS SRI SUSHIL KUMAR AND MR NOORULLA …RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.R.V. SADASHIVAPPA, ADVOCATE)

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
SRI RAJU S/O SRI PONNA PUJARI
respondent
M/S NAVAKAR REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM

Coram

AI extract

H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Karnataka HC
Decided on: 7 Dec 2023 · December
Registered: 13 Sept 2019
Case no.: MFA/7726/2019

All orders in this case

2 orders share this CNR

7 Dec 2023Order 1 — this page · H.t. Narendra Prasad
24 Mar 2026Order 2 · K.s. Hemalekha

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from H.t. Narendra Prasad

Sri Sunil Kumar C Vs the Manager Hdfc Ergo Insurance Co. Ltd.
6 Dec 2023
Venkatesh E Vs the Managing Director Bmtc
6 Dec 2023
Smt R Ambika Vs the Icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.
6 Dec 2023
Mr Sriram Vs the Manager
7 Dec 2023

Cite this judgement

Sri Raju v. M/S Navakar, MFA/7726/2019 (KA), decided on 7 December 2023.

The High Court of Karnataka publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

An appeal filed by the defendant challenging a temporary injunction was dismissed for non-prosecution because the appellant did not appear on the date fixed for admission, indicating lack of interest in prosecuting the appeal.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED. 19.02.2019, PASSED ON IA.NO.I, IN O.S. NO.7501/2018, ON THE FILE OF THE LVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-59), BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE IA.NO.I, FILED U/O.39 RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:44424 MFA No. 7726 of 2019

JUDGMENT

This appeal is filed by the defendant challenging the temporary injunction granted by the trial court dated 19.02.2019 on IA No.1 in O.S.No.7501/2018 filed by the plaintiff.

There is no interim order granted by this Court staying the order dated 19.02.2019. The impugned order is operating from 19.02.2019, till today. Now the suit is set down for evidence of the parties.

When the matter was called on 04.12.2023, none

appeared for the appellant. Even today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

All pending applications stand disposed of.

Sd/JUDGE

CM List No.: 3 Sl No.: 42

CNR

KAHC010299662019

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

H.t. Narendra Prasad

Disposal

Dismissed for Non-Prosecution

Sri G Raj Kumar @ Raj Kumar Ganapathi Vs M/S United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

7 Dec 2023

Smt. Rukmini C. M. Vs the Manager

7 Dec 2023