Smt Roopa K v. Smt Jayamma
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellant filed an incidental appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC seeking permission to withdraw. The single-judge bench allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw appeal allowed and appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
- 1 -
MFA No. 745 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 745 OF 2023 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT ROOPA K AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS W/O K R MANJUNATHA RESIDING AT NO 1 SRINEEDHI KRUPA BASAVESHWARA LAYOUT GUNDAPPA ROAD NAGASHETTYHALLI (NEAR RAILWAY GATE) R M V 2ND STAGE R M V POST, SANJAYNAGARA BANGALORE 560094
…APPELLANT
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. B V BADRINATH., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt Roopa K
- respondent
Smt Jayamma
- respondent
Sri Gunashekara
- respondent
Sri Umesh
- respondent
Smt Sunanda
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/745/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court