Dismissed

Sri a L Anjeenappa v. Sri Rama Murthy

Karnataka HC27 Oct 2023MFA/7132/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act, filed against an order allowing a petition under Section 276. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, which was permitted, resulting in the appeal being dismissed.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum.

Sri a L Anjeenappa Vs Sri Rama Murthy — Succession and Inheritance | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:38094 MFA No. 7132 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 27^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 7132 OF 2021 (ISA)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SRI A L ANJEENAPPA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.

¶8

SRI.A.L.SHIVAPPA S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS.

¶9

SRI.L.CHANDRASHEKAR S/O LATE LAKSHMAIAH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.

¶10

Digitally signed by DHANALAKSHMI MURTHY Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶11

SRI.A.M.LIKITH S/O LATE MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS

¶12

SRI.A.M.LAKSHMISHA S/O LATE MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS REP. BY HIS BROTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN SRI A.M.LIKITH ALL ARE R/AT BASAVESHWARA BEEDI ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562 107.

¶13

…APPELLANTS

¶14

(BY SRI. K.R. NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. VISWANATHA SETTY V.,ADVOCATE)

¶15

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:38094 MFA No. 7132 of 2021

¶16

AND:

¶17

SRI RAMA MURTHY S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT ATTIBELE VILLAGE AND HOBLI ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRCT-562 107.

¶18

…RESPONDENT

¶19

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 299 INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED: 13.11.2020 PASSED IN P AND S.C.NO. 5025/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIT AT ANEKAL, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 276 OF INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT.

¶20

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

JUDGMENT

¶22

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo

¶23

dated 27.10.2023 stating that he may be permitted to withdraw the above appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum.

¶24

Memo dated 27.10.2023 is placed on record.

¶25

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:38094 MFA No. 7132 of 2021

¶26

In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as

¶27

withdrawn with liberty to approach the appropriate legal forum.

¶28

The registry is directed to return the certified copy of

¶29

the appeal papers and original annexures to the appellants after retaining the xerox copy of the same, forthwith.

¶30

In view of disposal of the main appeal, all pending applications do not survive for consideration. Hence, the same are also disposed of.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

¶33

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Sri a L Anjeenappa v. Sri Rama Murthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri a L Anjeenappa v. Sri Rama Murthy

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Sunandamma Vs Smt Rathnamma

Sri Ratanlal Vs Sri Ashok Kumar S

Manjegowda Vs Puttaraju

Pradeepkumar M Vs Renuka

Sri. Mastanee S Vs Sri. Santhosh Kumar Yadav

Sri Suresh S Vs Sri P Lakshminarayana