Disposed

Ganesha B.J v. the Manager

Karnataka HC1 Dec 2023MFA/6611/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The First Additional District Judicial Magistrate and Member, MACT, Hassan, partially allowed a compensation claim. The High Court Legal Services Committee, Bengaluru before the Lok Adalat settled the dispute via a joint memo increasing the compensation to Rs. 50,000.

What did the court decide?

The appeal dismissed by consent; compensation enhanced to Rs. 50,000 with provision for 9% interest per annum on default.

Ganesha B.J Vs the Manager — Karnataka HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 01^ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G.SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA

¶7

¶8

SMT. PARINEETA S. CHANAL, MEMBER

¶9

M.F.A.No. 6611/2023 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 2079/2023)

¶10

BETWEEN:

¶11

Ganesha B.J. S/o Jagadisha,

¶12

Aged about 21 years, R/at Upparahosahalli Village, Shanthigrama Hobli,

¶13

Hassan Taluk & District-573 201. ...APPELLANT

¶14

(BY SRI. GIRISH B. BALADARE, ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND

¶16

The Manager, Sriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Infantry Road, Nariman Chamber, Bangalore – 560 007.

¶17

Harisha H.M. S/o Malleshappa, Major, R/o Near Vivekananda School, Northern Extension, Hassan District – 573 201. …RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SRI. B. PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R-1, NOTICE TO R-2 – D/W V.C.O. DATED 05.10.2023)

¶19

¶20

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 01.04.2023 PASSED IN MVC NO. 856/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND MEMBER, ADDL. MACT, HASSAN, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶21

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶22

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶23

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶24

The learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶25

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶26

¶27

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A. from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation amount shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶29

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶30

JUDGE

¶31

Sd/MEMBER

¶32

Rbv*

Ganesha B.J v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesha B.J v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shoheb Vs Smt Kamalamma

Sri. Adithya. R Vs M/S. International Travel House Ltd.

Naveen. C Vs Manjunatha. C

Sri Muniraju N v Vs Sri Chittbabu Koe

Sri Nagaraju Vs Nayaz Shariff

Madappa Vs the Divisional Controller