The appellant filed a miscellaneous first appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, challenging the Family Court's dismissal of a divorce petition. The appeal was dismissed by the High Court for want of prosecution as the appellant had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:23043-DB MFA No.6398 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6398 OF 2018 (FC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SRI. PRAJWAL KUMAR, ADV., FOR SRI. AMSHUMAN M, ADV.,)
…APPELLANT
AND:
ALSO AT: SARU VILLAGE GANJAM DISTRICT ODISSA-761102.
…RESPONDENT
- 2 - NC: 2023:KHC:23043-DB MFA No.6398 of 2018
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.07.2018 PASSED IN MVC.NO.5408/2017, ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(ia) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.Prajwal Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant submits he has no instructions in the matter. The aforesaid submission is placed on record.
The appeal is, therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
RV
Mr. Raj Ranjan Moharana
Ms. Narmada Moharana
Allok Aradhe
Anant Ramanath Hegde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
