Smt Pushpa v. Sri Shivaraj D S
Case brief
What is this about?
Family Court appeal filed under Section 19(1) of Family Courts Act to set aside a judgment. Appellant absent and uninterested in prosecuting. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
Family Court appeal filed under Section 19(1) of Family Courts Act to set aside a judgment. Appellant absent and uninterested in prosecuting. Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MFA No. 6366 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL M.F.A.NO.6366 OF 2016 (FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT PUSHPA W/O SRI SHIVARAJ AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS R/AT NO.30/1 OPP. GOVINDARAYA SWAMY TEMPLE 3RD CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD GOVINDARAJANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 040
…APPELLANT
Digitally signed by GAYATHRI N Location: High Court of Karnataka
(BY SMT. PUSHPA, APPELLANT - ABSENT)
AND:
SRI SHIVARAJ D S S/O SRI SIDDAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.1716, 13TH CROSS MUNESHWARANAGAR VIGNESHWARANAGAR SUNKADAKATTE BENGALURU - 560 091
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. C P DHANANJAYA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
MFA No. 6366 of 2016
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU, IN M.C.NO.2220/2012 DATED 11.07.2016; ALLOW THE APPEAL; AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEFS DEEMED FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, INCLUDING COSTS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
None has appeared on behalf of the appellant even
when the matter is called in the second round.
It appears appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
RR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Pushpa
Sri Shivaraj D S
Allok Aradhe
Vijaykumar A. Patil
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court