Harisha M v. R.M.Vijaykumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court found that the appellant failed to comply with a peremptory order dated 03.01.2023 and consequently dismissed the already pending miscellaneous first appeal.
What the court decided
- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:19650-DB MFA No. 4562/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4562/2021 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
HARISHA M S/O. MOHANA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT K K PURA ROAD BANGALORE – 560 096 …APPELLANT
(BY SRI. LAKSHMI KANTH K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- R.M.VIJAYKUMAR S/O. LATE. MALLASETTAPPA MAJOR R/AT SHIVAGANGANAGARA SMB SIR ROAD, TUMKUR - 572137
Digitally signed by A K CHANDRIKA Location: High Court of Karnataka
Parties & counsel
- appellant
HARISHA M
- respondent
R.M.VIJAYKUMAR
- respondent
THE MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- MFA/4562/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court