In MFA 4318/2021, the High Court of Karnataka dismissed a first appeal filed under Section 55 of the Indian Divorce Act against an order dismissing a divorce petition.
The Miscellaneous First Appeal stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4318 OF 2021
BETWEEN
SRI K ANAND GOWDA S/O LATE SRI DEVU GOWDA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDENT OF SUDHARMA NILAYA SHIVAJINAGAR ROAD VITTAL KASABA VILLAGE BANTWAL TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT. ……..Appellant
(By Sriyuths Dineshkumar K and Pooja Kattimani Advocates)
AND
SMT SAVITHA SILVIA TAURO W/O AUSTIN TAURO AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC PVC FLOORING CONTRACT OWRK R/AT ST. JUTE SCHOOL KERMAL VILLAGE AND POST PAKSHIKERE MANGALURU. ……..Respondent
2
MFA.No.4318/2021
This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 55 Indian Divorce Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 21.10.2019 passed in M.C.No.77/2017, on the file of the I Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore, dismissing the petition filed U/S 10(1) (ix) and (x) of the Indian Divorce Act.
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following:
O R D E R
Two weeks’ time is granted to comply with the office objections failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench.
NOTE: Vide Court Order dt.21.11.2022 the Office Objections are not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI K ANAND GOWDA S/O LATE SRI DEVU GOWDA
SMT SAVITHA SILVIA TAURO W/O AUSTIN TAURO
AlOk AradHE
SVISHWAJITH SHETTY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
