Disposed

Ananda v. Manjunatha C

Karnataka HC12 Jan 2023MFA/4187/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Lok Adalat disposed of an appeal filed against a Motor Vehicle Accident claim award. Through negotiations, the insurance company and the claimant reached an out-of-court settlement. The Respondent-Insurance Company agreed to pay an enhanced lump sum of Rs. 95,000/- over the original award, with interest provisions for delay, in full and final settlement.

What did the court decide?

Settlement reached: Respondent-Insurance Company to pay Rs. 95,000/- in addition to Tribunal award as enhanced compensation with interest provisions for delay in settlement.

Ananda Vs Manjunatha C — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 12^th DAY OF JANUARY 2023

¶5

CONCILIATORS PRESENT:

¶6

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR &

¶7

MS. M.R. RASHMI, MEMBER

¶8

M.F.A.No. 4187/2018 (MV) (Lok Adalat No. 54/2023)

¶9

BETWEEN

¶10

Ananda S/o Papanna, Aged about 40 years, R/at Vadagere Village, Muduvathi Post, Kolar Taluk and District.

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

(By Sri. Pavana Chandra Shetty H., Advocate)

¶13

AND

¶14

1 . Manjunatha C. S/o Chinnappa, R/at Sonnenahalli Village, Chakarasanahalli Post, Kolar Taluk – 563 101.

¶15

National Insurance Co. Ltd., No.1092/2, New Extension, Near Doom Light Circle, Kolar-563 101, Rep: by its Branch Manager. RESPONDENTS

¶16

(By Sri. : O. Mahesh, Advocate for R-2, Notice to R-1 – d/w v.o. dated 29.11.2022)

¶17

¶18

MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 14.11.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO. 147/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRL. JMFC, K.G.F., PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.

¶19

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.

¶20

CONCILIATION ORDER

¶21

The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant - Claimant is present.

¶22

The learned Counsel appearing for the respondent – Insurance Company along with its representative are present.

¶23

After prolonged negotiations, the matter is settled. A joint memo signed by the learned advocate appearing for the appellant/claimant (being authorized by the appellant/claimant to sign) and the learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Insurance Company and its authorized officer is filed. The appellant-claimant has agreed to receive and the respondent-Insurance Company has agreed to pay a lump-sum of Rs. 95,000/- (Rupees Ninety Five Thousand only), in addition to what has been awarded by the Tribunal, in full and final settlement of the claim.

¶24

The Respondent - Insurance Company has agreed to deposit the said amount before the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of preparation of

¶25

¶26

award, failing which the said amount shall carry interest at the rate of 9% P.A.

¶27

from the date of default, till the date of deposit.

¶28

The entire enhanced compensation shall be released in favour of the appellant / claimant, on proper identification.

¶29

This Miscellaneous First Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the Joint

¶30

memo. The Judgment and Award of the Tribunal shall stand modified accordingly. Draw up the Award accordingly.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

JUDGE

¶33

Sd/MEMBER

¶34

Rbv

Ananda v. Manjunatha C

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ananda v. Manjunatha C

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Mohammed Mukthiyar Pasha Vs Mr Paramesh H

Thaheer Hussain Vs Khadir Pasha

Chandrashekhar Vs Lakshmamma

T.M.Puttappayya Vs Gurushantha B.S.

Harsha Vs Narasimha

Murali Vs Ramanjaneya T