Appeal governed by MV Act was heard in absence of appellant on two occasions. Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution due to absentia of appellant throughout proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 395 OF 2018 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI.DINESHA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, S/O SRI.NINGEGOWDA, R/AT CHIKKABOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE, HANDRANGI POST, KONANURU HOBLI, ARAKALGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 102.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI.M.NARAYANASWAMY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by JAI JYOTHI J Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:43052 MFA No. 395 of 2018
BENGALURU - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V.R. BALARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. A.N. KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:06.10.2017 PASSED IN MVC NO.1464/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, & MEMBER,MACT, ARKALGUD, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF RS.96,380/- WITH INTEREST @ 6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL DEPOSIT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
When the matter came up before this Court on 21.11.2023 as there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, this matter was directed to be listed on 22.11.2023 under the caption for dismissal. On 22.11.2023, the matter was passed over, adjourned to 24.11.2023. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
RMS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 92 CT:SNN
SD/JUDGE
SRI.DINESHA
SRI.HUCHACHIAH
THE MANAGER, H.D.F.C. ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
