The appellant, Bhagya, sought to retire from the miscellaneous first appeal challenging a divorce decree. The court found no active interest from the appellant and dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution.
The miscellaneous first appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:20920-DB MFA No.106 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.106 OF 2017 (MC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of Karnataka
…APPELLANT
(BY SMT. BHAGYA, (ABSENT))
AND:
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. P. MANJUNATHA, ADV.,)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 28(1) OF THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED17.08.2016 PASSED IN M.C.NO.53/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, & JMFC, BHADRAVATHI, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S 13(1)(ia)(ib) (i) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.H.C.Shivaramu, learned counsel for the
appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to retire from the case. The aforesaid memo is accepted.
He is permitted to retire from the case.
appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
RV
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the miscellaneous first appeal filed under Section 28(1) of the Hindu Marriage Act can be sustained for want of prosecution.
BHAGYA
JAYANNA
ALOK ARADHE
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
