Dismissed

Dr.Jakeer Jakeer Hussain Havanuru v. Smt.Yasmin Bismilla

Karnataka HC9 Nov 2023MFA/102882/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984, against a Family Court decree granting restitution of conjugal rights. The appellant expressed no interest in prosecuting the appeal and sought dismissal as withdrawn based on amicable settlement between parties.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.

Dr.Jakeer Jakeer Hussain Havanuru Vs Smt.Yasmin… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC-D:13092-DB MFA No. 102882 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV

¶5

AND

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102882 OF 2019 (FC-)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

DR. JAKEER HUSSAIN HAVANURU, S/O. LATE HAVANURU SHAFISAB, AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER, R/O: 5TH WARD, HUVINAHADAGALI, TQ: HUVINAHADAGALI, DIST: BALLARI-583101.

¶9

…APPELLANT

¶10

(BY SRI. A.S. PATIL, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

VINAYAKA B V

¶13

SMT. YASMIN BISMILLA, D/O. LATE BISMILLA RAJASAB, W/O. DR. JAKIR HUSAIN HAVANUR, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O # 140, WARD NO.28, YUNUS MANZIL, DOLLARS COLONY, BANDIHATTI ROAD, OPP KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, BALLARI, DIST:BALLARI-583101.

¶14

…RESPONDENT

¶15

Digitally signed by VINAYAKA B V

¶16

Date: 2023.11.15 10:41:04 +0530

¶17

(BY SRI. ANAND R. KOLLI, ADVOCATE)

¶18

THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.19(1) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED: 26.06.2019, PASSED IN O.S.NO.6/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BALLARI, DECREEING THE PETITION SUIT FILED FOR RESTITUTION OF CONJUGAL RIGHTS.

¶19

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

2 - NC: 2023:KHC-D:13092-DB MFA No. 102882 of 2019

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo,

¶23

which reads as hereunder:

¶24

“The counsel appearing for the appellant in the top noted appeal, upon instructions of the appellant submits that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the above appeal and he prays this Hon’ble Court to dispose of the above appeal as not pressed.

¶25

Hence, this memo, and same may kindly be taken on record to meet the ends of justice.”

¶26

The submission is made that the parties have amicably

¶27

settled the interse dispute. In light of the same, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Pending applications, if any, do not survive for

¶29

consideration and accordingly, they are disposed off.

¶30

Sd/JUDGE

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

JTR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26

Dr.Jakeer Jakeer Hussain Havanuru v. Smt.Yasmin Bismilla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr.Jakeer Jakeer Hussain Havanuru v. Smt.Yasmin Bismilla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Sangappa Roddannavar S/O Shivanappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Laxmi Venkappa Budihal Vs Sri. Manjunath Kenchappa Magi

Shri. Muttappa S/O. Nagapa Harijan Vs the Under Secretary

Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs Smt. Anuradha Krishna @ Kisan Jambalekar

Shri. Mahesh S/O Krishna Harakantra Vs Union of India

Shri. Prashant S/O Madhukar Naik Vs Union of India