grounds urged in the application filed by the petitioner herein brought to notice of this Court paragraph No.22, wherein an observation is made that the condition presupposes that bank account pertaining to respondent No.2-Institution, so far has not been submitted to the Board, and so far has not been opened the account in the name of respondent No.2 Wakf Institution. The mis- appropriation can be made out only when accounts are submitted. But in the present case, respondent No.3 has not submitted accounts for years, certainly this aspect disentitled petitioner herein from assuming the office as Muthuvalli and also observation made while disposing of IA in Application No.16/2020. The counsel also brought to notice of this Court paragraph No.25, wherein also discussed that Managing Committee has been constituted as per the impugned order, representation is received from the devotees to appoint new Administrator and respondent No.1 has also deliberated and unanimously resolved to constitute a Managing Committee and also in paragraph Nos.27 and 28, particularly in paragraph in 28 discussed with regard to the lapses on the part of the petitioner herein, then only comes to the conclusion that impugned order passed by the Board is necessary for proper
