respondent. Likewise, there is no dispute that the term of lease had expired and as on the date of the suit, the petitioners were tenants at sufferance. Similarly, there is no dispute regarding the issuance of notice of termination of the tenancy to the petitioners. Therefore, the trial Court did not have any other alternative than to decree the suit of the respondent. Therefore, the contention of the learned senior counsel for the petitioners that there was a dispute regarding title of the respondent is of no consequence. Though the learned senior counsel submitted that there was some illegality in the issuance of the notice of termination, yet a perusal of the same does not disclose any illegality. Therefore, there is no error committed by the trial Court in directing the ejectment of the petitioners from the petition premises. Nonetheless, since the petitioners are operating a petroleum outlet in the petition premises, this Court considers it appropriate to grant a period of one year from today to quit and deliver vacant possession of the petition premises subject to the petitioners paying up all the arrears of rent at the rate of Rs.600/- per month from the date of suit till today and at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per month from today till vacating the petition premises and also pay the outstanding
