and Others and brought to notice paragraph No.7 wherein discussed with regard to Order 7 Rule 11 and also brought to notice of this Court paragraph No.18, wherein also discussed with regard to considering the case of the parties and in paragraph No.20 in detail discussed invoking Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC and an observation is made that under Order 7 Rule 11, a duty is cast on the Court to determine whether the plaint discloses a cause of action by scrutinizing the averments in the plaint and also it could thus be seen that this Court has held that the power conferred on the Courts to terminate a civil action is a drastic one, and the conditions enumerated under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC are required to be strictly adhered to. However, under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC, the duty is cast upon the Court to determine whether the plaint discloses a cause of action, by scrutinizing the averments in the plaint, read in conjunction with the documents relied upon, or whether the suit is barred by any law. The Court has held that the underlying object of Order VII Rule 11 of CPC is that when a plaint does not disclose a cause of action, the Court would not permit the plaintiff to unnecessarily protract the proceedings. It has been held that in such a case, it will be necessary to put an
