A civil revision petition was filed against an impugned order. Having no representation and the petitioners showing no interest in prosecuting the matter, the High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:45870 CRP No. 176 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 176 OF 2023 (IO)
BETWEEN:
1ST AND 2ND PETITIONERS ARE RESIDING AT: SURYA NO. 87/2, RICHMOND ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 025.
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ASHOK B PATIL.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ATHMANANDA R, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O R3)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.12.2022 PASSED ON IA No.II IN OS No.942/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE IA No.II FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(a), (b) AND (d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.
Sd/JUDGE
KTY
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 CPC should be admitted or dismissed due to non-prosecution by the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHRI E. VIVEK REDDY
SHRI E. V. GOUTHAM REDDY
SHRI SHARATH REDDY
SMT. AKKAYAMMA
SHRI VIJAY. R
SMT. INDRANI. R.
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
