Sri C D Veeresh Murthy v. Smt. C N Bramarambha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal revision petition in an absent hearing, noting the petitioner's lack of interest and absence of representation.
The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal revision petition in an absent hearing, noting the petitioner's lack of interest and absence of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 830 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
SRI C. D. VEERESH MURTHY, S/O. DODDAVEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, WORKING AT B.W.S.S.B., HIGH GROUNDS, BANGALORE - 560 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. C. S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by RENUKAMBA K G
Location: High Court of Karnataka
SMT. C. N. BRAMARAMBHA, W/O. VEERESH MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT #70, MARUTHI LAYOUT, SANJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 094.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DINESHA E. P., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.379 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ORDER DATED.27.08.2014 PASSED IN LEARNED PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT (SESSIONS)-XI, BANGALORE IN CRL.A.NO.456/2013 AND IMPUGNED ORDER DATED.14.08.2013 PASSED BY THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE, MMTC-IV, BANGALORE IN CRL.MISC.NO.29/2010 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:28634 CRL.RP No. 830 of 2014
ORDER
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner is absent.
Hence, the Revision Petition stands dismissed .
Sd/JUDGE
MS* List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14 CT: AVB
Sri C. D. Veeresh Murthy
Smt. C. N. Bramarambha
Rajendra Badamikar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court