Disposed
Ivon Fernandes v. Ram Prasad
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/703/2015
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 703 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. 703 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.RP No. 703 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 703 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
IVON FERNANDES S/O FRANCIS FERNANDES, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT PADI, PUTTUR KASABA VILLAGE, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K.-574201.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KRISHNAMOORTHY.D, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RAM PRASAD AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O LATE NARAYANA, R/AT UMASHANKARA FARMS, PANJIGUDDE, PADNOOR POST, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K.-574201
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. K.SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397(1) READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 15.04.2015 PASSED BY THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALORE SITTING AT PUTTUR, D.K.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
CRL.RP No. 703 of 2015
ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent/accused has expired.
not aware of the same.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondent, this revision petition has abated.
However, it is open for the petitioner to seek revival if the submission of learned counsel for respondent is not correct.
Sd/JUDGE
PK
IVON FERNANDES
RAM PRASAD
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court