The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal revision petition for non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear despite being called twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.RP No. 588 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 588 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
BENGALURU DISTRICT-562123
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR H.B., ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. KRISHNA KUMAR K.K., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI. B.S.GAUTHAM, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.2)
CRL.RP No. 588 of 2022
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF REJECTION DATED 19.03.2022 ON THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 227 OF CR.P.C. PASSED IN SPL.C.NO.8/2021 ON THE FILE OF II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-G AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-F AND ALLOW THIS PETITION WITH COSTS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners though the
petition is called twice in the day.
Hence, the revision petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Pending I.A., if any, also stands dismissed.
Sd/JUDGE
PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48
2 provisions across 1 enactments
CHANDRASHEKAR S/O KALEGOWA AND OTHERS
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
NAGESH M. S/O LATE MUNIRAJU
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
