Dismissed
Smt Chinnama B B v. Shri Kumara H M
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/316/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 316 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. 316 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.RP No. 316 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 316 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHINNAMA B.B. AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS. R/AT NO.12, 1ST CROSS, KUVEMPUNAGARA, CHANNAPATNA TOWN, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT, WORKING AS TECHNICAL ASSISTANT, RESEARCH EXTENSION CENTRE, NO.440, NEW PWD OFFICE, OPP. SANJAY THEATRE, T.B. CIRCLE, MADDUR TOWN, MADDUR - 571 428.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARAVIND M. NEGLUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SHRI KUMARA H.M. S/O MALLEGOUDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESIDENT OF HULIGEREPURA VILLAGE, MALAGARANAHALLI POST, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571428.
(BY SRI. T.J.SULASA, ADVOCATE)
…RESPONDENT
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 11.09.2017 IN C.C.NO.2018/2014 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MADDUR AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A.NO.82/2017 DATED 09.01.2018, PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MANDYA
CRL.RP No. 316 of 2019
CONSEQUENTLY, ACQUIT THE PETITIONER HEREIN IN C.C.NO.2018/2014.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner/accused has expired and the criminal prosecution against her has abated.
Learned counsel for the respondent is absent.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this revision petition is dismissed as abated.
Any amount in deposit before the Trial Court is ordered to be released in favour of the respondent. The Registry is directed forthwith to return the Trial Court as well as the Appellate Court records.
Sd/JUDGE
PMR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 59
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT. CHINNAMA B.B.
SHRI KUMARA H.M.
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court