Dismissed
B. Srinivas Naik v. the Senior Labour Inspector
Karnataka HCCRL.RP/250/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 250 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
No. 250 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.RP No. 250 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 250 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
B. SRINIVAS NAIK S/O AITHU NAIK (LATE) 74 YEARS, NO.423/70, 10TH 'G' MAIN ROAD, 6TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 010.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. GEETHA J. KADUR, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
THE SENIOR LABOUR INSPECTOR, DEPT. OF LABOUR, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001.
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. KRISHNA KUMAR K.K., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH SECTION 401 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF CONVICTION OF THE APPELLATE COURT DATED: 26.02.2014 IN CRL.A.NO.72/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT-VIII, BANGALORE, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE
CRL.RP No. 250 of 2014
TRIAL COURT DATED:20.01.2012 IN C.C.NO.139/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE MMTC-II, BANGALORE AND DISMISS THE COMPLAINT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner though the
case is called thrice in the day.
Hence, the Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
SMA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B. SRINIVAS NAIK
THE SENIOR LABOUR INSPECTOR
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court