her to pay fine of Rs.5,00,000/-. Being aggrieved by the said judgment of conviction, the accused filed Crl.A.No.178/2018. The Appellate Court secured the records of the Trial Court, heard the counsel for the parties and framed points for consideration and re-appreciated the evidence and held that, the accused had admitted the issuance of the cheque. It held that the accused failed to examine the person whose handwriting was found on the cheque in question, it held that the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of NI Act, 1881 has to be drawn in the present case as admittedly, the signature of the accused was found on the cheque in question. It held that though the accused claimed that the cheque in question was given as a security for a loan raised by her husband in the year 2011, the said loan was discharged admittedly and therefore, it was for her to take steps to collect back the cheque and other documents and she having not done so, she had failed to rebut the presumption. Hence, it dismissed the appeal in terms of the Judgment dated 24.12.2018. Being aggrieved by the judgments of both the Courts, this revision petition is filed.
