Criminal revision petition filed by proponents of deceased petitioners to set aside maintenance orders. The petition stands abated due to the death of the original petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:34238 CRL.RP No. 160 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 160 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by RENUKAMBA K G
Location: High Court of Karnataka
SHAHINA BANU, D/O MOHAMMED GHOUSE @ BASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT IN FRONT OF S.P OFFICE, KELAGOTE, TURUVANUR ROAD, CHITRADURGA.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. B.M. SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER IN CRL.A.NO.111/2014, DATED 08.01.2015, PASSED BY THE LEARNED ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHITRADURGA, SO FAR IT RELATED TO CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED PRL.CIVIL
NC: 2023:KHC:34238 CRL.RP No. 160 of 2015
JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, CHITRADURGA, DATED 23.07.2014, REGARDING PAYMENT OF RS. 10,000/- PER MONTH AS MAINTENANCE TO THE RESPONDENT AND SET ASIDE THE ODER IN CRL.MISC. NO.74/2013 DTD.23.07.2014 PASSED BY THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHITRADURGA.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned Counsel for the revision petitioner submits that
both the petitioners died long back and he is not able to obtain
the death extracts of revision petitioners.
the fact of death of the revision petitioners is not disputed.
abated.
Sd/JUDGE
PMP/RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khader Hayath Basha
J. Riyaz
Shahina Banu
Rajendra Badamkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
