The Criminal Revision Petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal revision petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1336 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
D.M. RAMAKRISHNA @ ANIL PRASAD @ DUBAI RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMESH @ RAMESH BABU @ ARAVIND @ DR. VIDYASANGAR @ DR. ANAND @ DR. SACHIN MANJUNATH @ RAVHAVENDRA @ VENKATESH, SON OF MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. DODDAMULAGODU, T. NARASIPURA TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 124. ... PETITIONER
(BY SRI J. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
THIS CRL.R.P. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.P.C. TO SET SIDE THE ORDER DATED 18.01.2020 PASSED BY THE LXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-
CRL.RP No. 1336 of 2021
66), IN S.C.NO.49/2016 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED IN S.C.NO.49/2016 ON THE FILE OF LXV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH66) AND ALLOW THIS PETITION.
THIS CRL.R.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition.
The aforesaid memo is taken on record.
Accordingly, the criminal revision petition is
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
MBM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.M. RAMAKRISHNA @ ANIL PRASAD @ DUBAI RAMAKRISHNA @ RAMESH @ RAMESH BABU @ ARAVIND @ DR. VIDYASANGAR @ DR. ANAND @ DR. SACHIN MANJUNATH @ RAVHAVENDRA @ VENKATE
STATE OF KARNATAKA
SMT. T.S. NALINI
MAHALAKSHMI B M
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
