Petitioner filed a criminal revision petition against conviction. Petitioners counsel filed a memo withdrawing the petition after payment to respondent. Court allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn. Pending interlocutory applications disposed off. Trial court records sent to Trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1018 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
SMT POORNIMA, W/O MR SUNIL, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: HOUSEWIFE, R/O GUDDEMANE, THARETHOTA, KULASHEKAR POST, MANGALURU - 575008, (ACCUSED BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT APPELLANT BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT) …PETITIONER (BY SRI B RAVINDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR S PRAVEEN SUVARNA, S/O LATE SANJEEV SUVARNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT "SWATHIK", KOPPAL CROSS ROAD, KONCHADY POST, YEYYADI, MANGALORE - 575008, (COMPLAINANT BEFORE THE TRAIL COURT RESPONDENT BEFORE THE LOWER APPELLATE COURT) …RESPONDENT (BY SRI DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 5.6.2017 PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU IN CRL.A.NO.124/2016 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED
NC: 2023:KHC:44074 CRL.RP No. 1018 of 2017
27.6.2016 PASSED BY THE J.M.F.C.-IV COURT, MANGALURU IN C.C.NO.967/2014 CONSEQUENTLY ACQUIT THE PETITIONER OF THE CHARGE LEVELLED HIM.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo for
withdrawal of the petition. Memo reads as under:-
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
"In view of the above matter, during the pendency of the instant Petition, the Petitioner has been paid the entire amount to the Respondent before the Trial Court. Hence the instant Petition is does not survive for consideration. Hence that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to withdraw the instant Petition, in the interest of justice and equity".
Bengaluru Advocate for Petitioner Date:06.12.2023 B.Ravindra Prasad
record.
NC: 2023:KHC:44074 CRL.RP No. 1018 of 2017
In view of withdrawal of the petition, all pending
interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed off.
Registry is directed to send Trial Court Records to
Trial Court.
Sd/JUDGE
CHS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 54
Smt Poornima
Mr S Praveen Suvarna
Venkatesh Naik Tripura
C.J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
