Disposed

Sri Chandrashekhar Parasharam Malkache v. Shri Pundalik S/O Gundu Patil

Karnataka HC19 Sept 2023CRL.RP/100373/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a criminal revision petition challenging conviction under Section 138 NI Act as being infructuous because the accused had deposited the entire fine amount before the revision court.

What did the court decide?

The criminal revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous due to the deposition of the fine amount by the accused.

Sri Chandrashekhar Parasharam Malkache Vs Shri Pundalik… — Cheque Dishonour | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC-D:10824 CRL.RP No. 100373 of 2022

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

¶4

DATED THIS THE 19^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

¶7

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100373 OF 2022

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR PARASHARAM MALKACHE, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.94, NEAR LAXMI TEMPLE, BHANDUR GALLI BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI. (BY SRI. SHARAD V.MAGADUM, ADVOCATE)

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

AND:

¶12

CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI

¶13

Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2023.09.20 15:19:45 +0530

¶14

SHRI. PUNDALIK, S/O GUNDU PATIL, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: H.NO.580, BRAHMA NAGAR, KHANAPUR ROAD, PEERANWADI BELAGAVI, DIST: BELAGAVI-590001.

¶15

…RESPONDENT

¶16

(BY SRI. R.R.BADEGHAR AND SRI. S.H.YADAWAD, ADVS)

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S.397 R/W SEC.401 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING THIS COURT TO, SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION PASSED BY XI ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, BELAGAVI, IN CRL.A. NO.212/2019 DATED 17.08.2022 CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE VII-JMFC BELAGAVI IN C.C.NO.304/2018 DATED 28.05.2019 AND FURTHER ACQUIT THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S. 138 OF N.I. ACT.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2023:KHC-D:10824 CRL.RP No. 100373 of 2022

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Learned counsel for petitioner filed a memo with documents.

¶23

This is an appeal by accused challenging his conviction and sentence imposed by the trial Court, which is confirmed by the Sessions Court. Vide the impugned judgment and order, the petitioner/accused is sentenced to pay fine of Rs.4,12,000/- with default sentence. On 17.02.2023, the parties have appeared before the trial Court and the accused has deposited entire fine amount of Rs.4,12,000/-. Out of which, Rs.4,10,000/- is payable to the complainant and remaining Rs.2,000/- to be defrayed as litigation expenses to go to the State. In view of the compliance of the impugned judgment and order, the trial Court has directed the concerned police not to execute warrant.

¶24

3 - NC: 2023:KHC-D:10824 CRL.RP No. 100373 of 2022

¶25

In the light of the same, this petition does not

¶26

survive for consideration and accordingly, it is disposed off as having become infructuous.

¶27

Sd/JUDGE

¶28

CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35

Sri Chandrashekhar Parasharam Malkache v. Shri Pundalik S/O Gundu Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Chandrashekhar Parasharam Malkache v. Shri Pundalik S/O Gundu Patil

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Imrankhan S/O Hanif Sab Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Prashant D Naik S/O Dataram Naik Vs the State of Karnataka

Amey S/O Anant Kadam Vs Shri Vijay Vithal Patil

Shrishail Vs State of Karnataka

Ningappa S/O Hanamanthappa Navalli Vs the State of Karnataka

Lakshmavva W/O Ramappa Chigari Vs the State of Karnataka