High Court of Karnataka dismissed Criminal Revision Petition filed by the State for non-compliance with office objections, despite multiple adjournments granted over a period of years.
Criminal Revision Petition No. 100143 of 2020 is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:12620 CRL.RP No. 100143 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100143 OF 2020
BETWEEN:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY POLICE SUB INSPECTOR, BYADAGI POLICE STATION, DISTRICT HAVERI, THROUGH THE ADDL. STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y. DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP)
AND:
Digitally
signed by
V N
V N BADIGER
BADIGER Date:
2023.10.31
14:40:13
+0530
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.37/2016 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI, SITTING AT RANEBENNUR DATED 06/09/2019 AND 1ST ADDL. JMFC, BYADAGI IN CC NO.626/2002 DATED 30/10/2015 AND SET ASIDE THE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.37/2016 ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS
NC: 2023:KHC-D:12620 CRL.RP No. 100143 of 2020
JUDGE, AT HAVERI SITTING AT RANEBENNUR, DATED 06/09/2019 AND 1ST ADDL. JMFC, BYADAGI IN CC NO.626/2002 DATED 30/10/2015.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
On 29.03.2021, at the request of learned HCGP
appearing for the revision petitioner/State, four weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again on 25.01.2023, 03.03.2023, 07.06.2023 at the request of earned HCGP appearing for the revision petitioner/State, time was granted to comply with the office objections. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the office objections have not complied. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
VB
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 4
The State of Karnataka
Malleshappa S/o Siddappa Bushetti
Ramappa S/o Bharamappa Anvatti
S. Rachaiyah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
