Petitioner filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR. Upon the return of the petition by the Learned High Court Government Pleader and the petitioner's memo seeking leave to withdraw, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 8127 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. M.M. WAHEEDA, HCGP FOR R1)
NC: 2023:KHC:33413 CRL.P No. 8127 of 2023
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.159/2023 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT / MARATHAHALLI P.S., MARATHAHALLI SUB-DIVISION AS AGAINST THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 306 AND 34 OF IPC (SEC.498A IS INVOKED ONLY AS AGAINST THE ACCUSED NO.1) AND ETC.
THIS CRL.P. COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts
notice for respondent No.1.
is dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending I.As., if any, do not survive for consideration
in view of the dismissal of the main matter.
Sd/JUDGE
VP
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for quashing the FIR under Section 482 CrPC should be maintained when the petitioner has withdrawn it after being dropped from the charge sheet.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C. M. Reddy S/o Chinnaraju Reddy
State of Karnataka
Satish Kumar
Hemant Chandangooudar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
