Criminal Appeal filed to withdraw as the subject matter was mutually settled and respondent made payment. Permission to withdraw the appeal was granted, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the appeal as the matter was mutually settled; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 804 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
CHIDANANDA M, SON OF THIMMAPPA POOJARY, 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT MUGERODI HOUSE, KADESWALYA VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 574 211.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VISHWANATHA POOJARY M, ADVOCATE) AND:
Digitally signed by SANDHYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
MR. MOHAN NAIKA, SON OF NARAYANA NAIKA, 60 YEARS, INSTRUCTOR MECHANICAL SECTION, KPT.MANGALORE, MANGALORE TALUK, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 004.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. M. SUDHAKAR PAI, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED:4.6.2014 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, BANTWAL, D.K., IN C.C.NO.116/12 - ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
NC: 2023:KHC:46807 CRL.A No. 804 of 2014
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Both counsels are present.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
for withdrawal, in which it is stated as under:
"It is stated that subject matter in this appeal is mutually settled between parties. Respondent herein already made payment of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) in respect of the cheque in question in this appeal.
Appellant herein duly instructed me to withdraw this appeal as not pressing. Hence, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant permission to withdraw this appeal as not pressing."
3. In view of the memo, appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
PK CT: BHK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHIDANANDA M
MR. MOHAN NAIKA
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
