Criminal appeal filed to set aside acquittal in a cheque dishonour case. Appellant was absent; the court noted the appeal was not prosecuted and dismissed it. Pending applications were also disposed of.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and the pending application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 725 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
HANUMANTHEGOWDA G, S/O LATE PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NETRAVATHI PROVISION STORE, TUMKUR ROAD, NEAR DASARAHALLI BUS STOP, BENGALURU - 560 057.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHASHIDHAR K.N, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
TUMKUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 129.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M.N. NINGARAJU, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.A IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 13.02.2019 PASSED BY THE XX ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.27853/2016-ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant is absent.
Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
In view of dismissal of the main appeal, pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration and the same is disposed of.
URN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3 CT: BHK
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
HANUMANTHEGOWDA G
KRISHNAPPA G.V
KRISHNAPPA G.V
KRISHNAPPA G.V
RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
