A criminal appeal regarding acquittal was called out for orders. The appellant failed to clear office objections raised two years earlier and did not prosecute effectively. The High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and non-compliance.
The criminal appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution and for noncompliance of office objections.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC:46299-DB CRL.A No. 710 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 710 OF 2021 (A)
BETWEEN:
S/O LATE SIDDA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT H NO.15-30-3 PADMAVATHI NAGAR
TIRUPATHI CHITTOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH PIN 517501
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. N RAMALINGA REDDY., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VEENA KUMARI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
W/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
S/O SUBBANNA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS
S/O NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
NC: 2023:KHC:46299-DB CRL.A No. 710 of 2021
4. DILEEP
S/O NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS
ALL ARE R/AT G K PURAM RAJPET ROAD KGF KYSAMBALLI HOBLI BANGARPET TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT PINCODE 563122
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S.378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 07.01.2020 IN S.C.NO.236/2014, PASSED BY THE LEARNED III ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 323,346,307,201 R/W 34 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCE THIS DAY, UMESH M. ADIGA J., MADE THE FOLLOWING
ORDER
Matter is again called out. No representation for the appellant.
NC: 2023:KHC:46299-DB CRL.A No. 710 of 2021
the matter was filed about two years back. The matter even not reached the stage of admission due to noncompliance of office objections. Sufficient opportunities are given, however, the appellant did not prosecute the appeal effectively.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution as well for noncompliance of office objections.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/JUDGE
BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal should be allowed considering the failure to clear office objections and lack of prosecution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MR BONUS REDDY
SUMA
NARAYANAPPA
KARTHIK
DILEEP
H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
UMESH M ADIGA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
