Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash FIR was dismissed as infructuous due to withdrawal filed by counsel arising from filing of charge sheet.
Advertisement that the petition is dismissed as infructuous due to withdrawal by counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6641 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT: SAROJA NILAYA, NO.1 KIRLOSKAR LAYOUT, HESARAGHATTA MAIN ROAD, CHIKKASANDRA CROSS, NAGASANDRA POST, BANGALORE - 560 073.
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. UMAPATHI S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2023:KHC:45224 CRL.P No. 6641 of 2021
NO.18, LAKE VIEW DEFENCE COLONY, SHETTYHALLI, JALAHALLI WEST POST, BANGALORE - 560 015.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR REGISTERED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT ON THE BASIS UNDISCLOSED COMPLAINT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT REGISTERED VIDE CR.NO.99/2016 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.436-A,321-B KMC ACT AND 217 OF IPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE CMM COURT BENGALURU CITY.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo to withdraw the petition, in view of a charge sheet, filed
during the pendency of this Criminal Petition.
it has become infructuous. However, the petitioners are at
liberty to challenge the charge sheet in accordance with
law.
PHM
Sd/JUDGE
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. BALAJI
S. JAGADISH
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
MR. S. MUNIRAJU
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
