Mr K M Chethan v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed by two persons to quash a PCR and FIR, as the petition appeared in non-prosecution.
High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed by two persons to quash a PCR and FIR, as the petition appeared in non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6115 OF 2019
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT AMRUTH KUTEER, BRAHMIN'S VALLEY, MADIKERI-571218.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. HARISH GANAPATHY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
NC: 2023:KHC:39490 CRL.P No. 6115 of 2019
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1;
NOTICE IS SERVED ON RESPONDENT NO.2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 PRAYING TO QUASH THE P.C.R.NO.3857/2018 REGISTERED BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C., MADIKERI PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B AND QUASH THE SUBSEQUENT F.I.R REGISTERED BEFORE MADIKERI TOWN POLICE IN F.I.R NO.195/2018 DATED 12.12.2018 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 406, 408, 409, 417, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 AND 472 OF IPC, PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioners though
the case is called twice in the day.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31 sma
MR. K.M. CHETHAN
MRS. U.P. VEENA
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
B.R. RAVIPRASAD
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court