Sri Abdul Rahim v. Sri Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed
Case brief
What is this about?
2023:KHC:44663 CRL.A No. 581 of 2014 IN THE…
2023:KHC:44663 CRL.A No. 581 of 2014 IN THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 581 OF 2014 (A)
BETWEEN:
SRI ABDUL RAHIM, S/O. LATE T.ABDUL KHALIQ, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.35, ASHWATHNAGAR, NEW EXTENSION, 1ST MAIN, 1ST B CROSS, R.M.V 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE - 92.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI D K SRIRAMAPPA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by SANDHYA S Location: High Court of Karnataka
SRI SYED ISHTIAQ AHMED, S/O.LATE MUSHTAQ AHMED, R/AT NO.290, VARTHUR MAIN ROAD, VARTHUR VILLAGE, BANGALORE-87.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAMACHANDRA R NAIK, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C BY THE ADV., FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.5.2014 PASSED BY THE XVIII ADDL. CMM, BANGALORE, IN C.C.NO.23294/2009-ACQUITTING THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2023:KHC:44663 CRL.A No. 581 of 2014
JUDGMENT
Appellant's counsel absent. Respondent's counsel present.
Despite sufficient opportunity provided to the appellant,
appellant's counsel is not present and advanced his arguments. Appellant has no interest in prosecuting this case. Hence, I proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
Appeal is dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
tsn*
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10
SRI ABDUL RAHIM
SRI SYED ISHTIAQ AHMED
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court