Dismissed

Sri Tammaiah a M v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Oct 2023CRL.P/5642/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to quash an FIR under the NDPS Act. The Court granted leave to withdraw, dismissed the petition, and reserved liberty to file afresh upon filing of the charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet by filing a fresh petition.

Sri Tammaiah a M Vs State of Karnataka — Narcotics (NDPS) | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:36219 CRL.P No. 5642 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5642 OF 2023

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI TAMMAIAH A M S/O A.P.MOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, PROFESSION ADVOCATE RESIDING AT NO.323, LALITHA NILAYA, 4^TH CROSS, YERAGANAHALLI, MYSURU - 570 011.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. ABHISHEK J, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE ASHOKAPURAM POLICE STATION, MYSURU, REP. BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶14

MALLESH A S/O KANNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, POLICE INSPECTOR, ORGANISED CRIME WING, CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH UNIT MYSURU - 570 011.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)

¶17

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:36219 CRL.P No. 5642 of 2023

¶18

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.86/2022 REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 ASHOKAPURAM POLICE STATION, MYSURU AND COMPLAINT DATED 23.12.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN CRIME NO.0086/2022 OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 22(b) OF THE NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES ACT, 1985, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT JLB ROAD MYSURU CITY, WITH RESPECT TO ACCUSED NO.2 WHO IS THE PETITIONER HEREIN.

¶19

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this

¶22

Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to challenge the

¶23

charge sheet by filing the petition afresh.

¶24

The aforesaid submission is taken on record.

¶25

Accordingly, criminal petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for.

¶26

In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending interlocutory application does not survive for consideration.

¶27

Sd/JUDGE

¶28

MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 155

Sri Tammaiah a M v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Tammaiah a M v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri S D Shashikumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Yeshwanth M Vs State of Karnataka

Kannaya Govindaraj Vs State of Karnataka

M/S. Sai Nireeha Power Project Private Limited Vs State of Karnataka

M/S Sjr Prime Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

Abhisheka @ Chikka Vs State of Karnataka