Dismissed

Smt Shilpashree v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC23 Sept 2023CRL.P/542/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings. The petitioners sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet by filing a supplement, which the court accepted.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge charge sheet by filing a fresh petition.

Smt Shilpashree Vs the State of Karnataka — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

NC: 2023:KHC:34604 CRL.P No. 542 of 2023

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.542 OF 2023

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

SMT SHILPASHREE W/O NAGESH L AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS

¶10

SRI. NAGESH.K S/O KALLEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

¶11

PETITIONER NO.1 AND 2 ARE R/AT GORAMADAGU VILLAGE SIDLAGHATTA TOWN CHIKKABALLAPUR - 562 105

¶12

Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SRI. G.N.BABU @ GIRIBABU S/O H.V.BYRAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT HOSPETE VILLAGE JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI, SIDLAGHATTA CHIKKABALLAPUR - 562 105

¶14

…PETITIONERS

¶15

(BY SRI. NANJUNDA GOWDA M R, ADVOCATE)

¶16

AND:

¶17

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY SIDLAGHATTA RURAL POLICE CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT

¶18

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:34604 CRL.P No. 542 of 2023

¶19

REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BENGALURU - 560 001

¶20

SRI. KRISHNAPPA .P S/O LATE PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT K. MUTHAKADAHALLI VILLAGE SIDLAGHATTA TALUK CHIKKABALLAPUR - 562 105

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1)

¶23

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONERS IN CRIME NO.32/2022 OF SIDLAGHATTA TOWN POLICE (P.C.R.NO.118/2021) WHICH IS NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, SIDLAGHATTA, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120(B), 420, 468, 471, 506 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC AND ETC.,

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of

¶27

this Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to challenge the charge sheet by filing the petition afresh.

¶28

The aforesaid submission is taken on record.

¶29

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty as sought for.

¶30

3 - NC: 2023:KHC:34604 CRL.P No. 542 of 2023

¶31

In view of dismissal of the petition, pending interlocutory application does not survive for

¶32

consideration. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.

¶33

Sd/JUDGE

¶34

MDS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30

Smt Shilpashree v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Shilpashree v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudheesh R Vs the Station House Officer

Shri S G Basavaraju Vs the State of Karnataka

Naval Kishore Maloo Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Shivakumar. R Vs State of Karnataka

Mr. Doddaballapur Prasanna Achutarao Vs State of Karnataka

Mr B v Deepak Vs Smt R Ramya