The Karnataka High Court dismissed an abatement plea in a criminal appeal titled CRL.A No. 488 of 2014 by recording the death certificate of the respondent under S. 378(4) Cr.P.C. The judgment concludes that the appeal stands abated due to the respondent's death on 16.10.2020.
The criminal appeal stands abated due to the death of the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 488 OF 2014
BETWEEN:
SRI. MARIYAPPA S/O A.SHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.2220E, 18TH MAIN ROAD, 5TH CROSS, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE-560036.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI M S NAGARAJA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SANDHYA S Location: High SRI S. RAJENDRA SINGH Court of Karnataka S/O SUBHAH SINGH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT NO.606, B-20, B-TYPE, BDA QUARTERS, K-BAR ROAD, NEELASANDRA, BANGALORE-560047.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI AHAMED S N, ADVOCATE)
NC: 2023:KHC:43300 CRL.A No. 488 of 2014
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S. 378(4) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 03.05.2014 PASSED BY THE XIV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRTE, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.27319/2012 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ARGUMENTS THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant is present.
appearing for the respondent that respondent- S Rajendra Singh S/o Subhah Singh died on 16.10.2020 and in support of his submission he has produced the death certificate of the said respondent and the same is taken on record.
Sd/JUDGE
SN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MARIYAPPA S/O A.SHAMANNA
RAJENDRA SINGH S/O SUBHAH SINGH
G BASAVARAJA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
