not committed any offence as alleged in the First Information Report. A plain reading of the complaint does not make out prima facie case against the petitioner for which he has been charged. The allegations in the complaint do not make out a case as alleged by the prosecution and is just an attempt to harass and disturb the peaceful life of the petitioner and his family. It is further submitted that the entire cases rests on circumstantial evidence, which is to be proved at the time of trial. Even as per the case of the prosecution, the deceased died on account of accident and further as per Column number 17 of the charge sheet, accused No.1 who drove the vehicle and dashed against the deceased. Therefore, at this stage, even accepting the case of the prosecution, allegation of murder is against accused No.1 and hence, further custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required. He submits that accused No.2 having not at all participated in the alleged crime, whether the accused No.2 helped the accused No.1 with the knowledge of killing the deceased, is required to be proved during the fullfledged trial. Only on the basis of voluntary statement of accused No.1, the petitioner is implicated as accused No.2, that
