Dismissed

Sri Alevuru Premraj Kini v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Jul 2023CRL.P/3275/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Supreme Court of India held that the accused cannot be treated as a traitor only for the duration of the war against India based on an analogy to the English law in the trial of Muhammad Binul Hasan since India is not governed by English law by default and there is nothing in the Articles of War, 1942 to support such a conclusion.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri Alevuru Premraj Kini Vs the State of Karnataka — Corruption | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

NC: 2023:KHC:25423 CRL.P No. 3275 of 2018

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF JULY, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3275 OF 2018

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI.ALEVURU PREMRAJ KINI S/O LATE BABURAYA KINI R/AT NO.9-3-7/18 V T ROAD, THENKA PETE SHIVALLI VILLAGE-576101 UDUPI DISTRICT-576107 PRESENTLY R/AT ARAMANE, PANDUBETTU AMBALAPADI VILLAGE UDUPI DISTRICT - 576101

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

¶11

Digitally AND: signed by ALBHAGYA Location: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA HIGH BY UDUPI TOWN POLICE COURT OF UDUPI TALUK & DISTRICT KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 560001

¶12

…RESPONDENT

¶13

(BY SRI.JAGADEESH B.N, ADDL. SPP)

¶14

¶15

NC: 2023:KHC:25423 CRL.P No. 3275 of 2018

¶16

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 10.10.2017 MADE IN SPECIAL CASE NO.43/2012 BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI DISTRICT IN SPECIAL CASE NO.43/2012 ON APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 227 OF CR.PC FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/SEC.120B, 201, 409, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475 AND 484 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(ix)AND 3(2)(V) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 120B, 201, 409, 418, 419, 420, 465, 466, 467, 468, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475 AND 484 R/W SECTION 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3(1)(ix)AND 3(2)(V) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT AND ETC.

¶17

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed

¶20

a memo dated 21.07.2023 seeking withdrawal of the petition as the same does not survive for consideration.

¶21

The memo is placed on record.

¶22

In view of the above said memo, this criminal

¶23

petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

JUDGE

¶26

NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17

Sri Alevuru Premraj Kini v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri Alevuru Premraj Kini v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr Ubed Vs State of Karnataka

Mr Balasubramani S N Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Kumar Ravi Vs Sri v P Amarnatha Reddy

M Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Nayak M Vs Svc Co-Operative Bank Limited

Karavali Ayurvedic Medical College Hospital and Research Centre Vs Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Science

Smt. Shivaleela, Vs Sri. Shivakumar