Dismissed

Ashwini v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC9 Nov 2023CRL.P/2416/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners filed a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of a charge sheet. Counsel requested leave to withdraw the petition due to defective pleadings, reserving liberty to file afresh. The Court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition on withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the criminal petition was granted with liberty to file a fresh petition.

Ashwini Vs State of Karnataka — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - NC: 2023:KHC:40232 CRL.P No. 2416 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 9^TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2416 OF 2022

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

ASHWINI, W/O KARTHIK, D/O M.P.PANNEER SELVAN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,

¶8

VINOD, S/O PANNEER SELVAN, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS,

¶9

SUDEEP @ MANOJ, S/O SOMASHEKAR, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

¶10

Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

ALL ARE R/AT 54, 3^RD BLOCK, 4^TH CROSS, DASAPPA LAYOUT, RAMAMURTHY NAGARA, BANGALORE – 560 016.

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY SRI.SAMEER S N., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY RAM MURTHY NAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA. REPRESENTED BY THE SPP,

¶16

2 - NC: 2023:KHC:40232 CRL.P No. 2416 of 2022

¶17

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 01.

¶18

SRI. S. SUBRAMANI, S/O LATE ARMUGAM, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT NO.175, 6^TH CROSS, 8^TH MAIN, PILLANNA GARDEN, 3^RD STAGE, LINGARAJAPURA, BENGALURU CITY – 560 084.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI.K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1; SRI.RAJENDRA K.R., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶21

THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASHING THE CHARGE SHEET SUBMITTED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BANASAWADI POLICE STATION IN (CR.NO.164/2020) C.C.NO.52670/2021 TO THE HONBLE X ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT MAYO HAL BENGALURU CITY FOR OFFENCE P/U/S.341, 323, 324, 504, 506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition reserving liberty to file a petition afresh on the same cause of action, since the pleadings are defective.

¶25

Memo is placed on record.

¶26

¶27

NC: 2023:KHC:40232 CRL.P No. 2416 of 2022

¶28

Accordingly, petition is dismissed as withdrawn

¶29

reserving liberty as sought for.

¶30

Pending I.A does not survive for consideration.

¶31

Sd/JUDGE

¶32

RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38

Ashwini v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashwini v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahammad Jaufar Vs State by

Ms. Simi Kalakamba Vs State of Karnataka

Smt. Elizabeth Vs State of Karnataka

Srinivasa L Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Abhishek Rana, Vs State of Karnataka by

Managing Director Vs Food Safety Officer