Allowed

Chetan @ Shivu @ Kariya Chetu v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Oct 2023CRL.P/2339/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, accused No.2, in a murder case under Section 302 IPC. The court noted the lack of incriminating evidence and the absence of blood stains on the accused's seized clothes, directing release on personal bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner is enlarged on bail by executing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of appearance and non-interference.

Chetan @ Shivu @ Kariya Chetu Vs State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC:35972 CRL.P No. 2339 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2339 OF 2023

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

CHETAN @ SHIVU @ KARIYA CHETU S/O BORALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/AT 13/1, 9TH CROSS, AGHARA DASARAHALLI, BANGALURU - 560079 PERMANENT ADDRESS ALADAKATTE VILLAGE, KUDURU HOBLI,MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562159

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY SRI. DEENABANDHU RAI N., ADVOCATE)

¶12

AND:

¶13

Digitally signed by B A KRISHNA KUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶14

STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RMC YARD POLICE STATION BENGALURU - 86 NOW REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT COMPLEX BENGALURU - 560001

¶15

…RESPONDENT (BY SMT. SOWMYA R., HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.2/2022 OF R.M.C YARD P.S., BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/ 302, 201, 120B AND 506 R/W 34 OF IPC , PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE (CCH-56) IN S.C.NO.908/2022.

¶16

¶17

NC: 2023:KHC:35972 CRL.P No. 2339 of 2023

¶18

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Accused No.2 in S.C.No.908/2022 pending before the Court of LVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore arising out of Crime No.2/2022 registered by R.M.C. Yard Police Station, Bengaluru City for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC is before this Court under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., seeking regular bail.

¶21

¶22

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

¶23

On the complaint of Anniyamma W/o Rajappa dated 07.01.2022, FIR in Crime No.2/2022 was registered by R.M.C. Yard Police Station, Bengaluru City initially for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC against 3 to 4 unknown persons. In the complaint, it is averred that deceased Chandra was the brother of the complainant and he was married to Jennifer, who had recently deserted him. About a week prior to the date of complaint, Chandra had left the house and he did not have any mobile phone with him. On 07.01.2022, the complainant was informed by Ravi from

¶24

¶25

NC: 2023:KHC:35972 CRL.P No. 2339 of 2023

¶26

A.P.M.C. Yard that her brother Chandra was lying in a mini bus, which was parked behind Orion Distilleies. At about 5:00 p.m., the complainant went to the spot and found the dead body of

¶27

her brother. On enquiry, she was informed that about three to four persons had assaulted him at about 12:00 in the noon and it is in this background she had approached the Police and lodged the complaint which had resulted in registering FIR in Crime No.2/2022 by R.M.C. Yard Police Station against 3-4 unknown persons. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was arrested on 17.01.2022. Investigation in the case is completed and charge sheet has been filed for the aforesaid offences against three persons and the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.2 in the charge sheet. His bail application filed before the Court of the LVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in Crl.Misc.No.1230/2023 was dismissed on 17.02.2023. It is under these circumstances, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶28

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the charge sheet material would go to show that five persons were in the spot at the time of incident but the charge sheet has been filed only against three persons. He

¶29

4 - NC: 2023:KHC:35972 CRL.P No. 2339 of 2023

¶30

submits that there is no seizure from the petitioner and the weapon used to commit the crime was found lying in the bus itself. He submits that the petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2022. Investigation in the case is completed and the charge sheet has been filed and prays to allow the petition.

¶31

Per contra, learned HCGP has opposed the bail application and submits that there are witnesses who have seen the accused persons at the crime spot and accordingly, prays to dismiss the petition.

¶32

FIR in Crime No.2/2022 was initially registered against 3 to 4 unknown persons for offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of IPC. During the course of investigation, the petitioner was arrested on 17.01.2022. Investigation in the case is completed and the charge sheet has been filed. As per the charge sheet allegation, accused No.1 had some ill will against the deceased Chandra and therefore, he had conspired with other accused to commit the murder of Chandra. On 07.01.2022 at about 10:30 a.m., they went in search of Chandra and came to know that he was sleeping in a mini tempo, which was parked behind Orion Distilleies. At

¶33

¶34

NC: 2023:KHC:35972 CRL.P No. 2339 of 2023

¶35

about 11:30 a.m., they reached the spot and accused No.1 allegedly boarded the bus with a iron rod which was lying near the bus and had assaulted Chandra on his head, face and other parts of the body. Thereafter, allegedly accused Nos.2 and 3 also boarded the bus and assaulted deceased Chandra with the very same iron rod. However, the statement of eyewitnesses would go to show that they had seen only one person boarding the bus with the iron rod. The said eyewitnesses have also stated that there were five persons present at the crime. The seizure mahazar after arrest of accused No.2 would go to show that only his clothes have been seized at his instance and even the said clothes did not have any blood stains on it. The petitioner is in custody from 17.01.2022 onwards. Investigation in the case is completed and the charge sheet has been filed. Undisputedly, the petitioner has no criminal antecedents. Under the circumstances, I am of the view that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case for grant of regular bail. Accordingly, the following:

¶36

ORDER

¶37

Criminal petition is allowed . The petitioner-accused No.2 is directed to be enlarged on bail in S.C.No.908/2022 pending

¶38

¶39

NC: 2023:KHC:35972 CRL.P No. 2339 of 2023

¶40

before the Court of LVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore arising out of Crime No.2/2022 of R.M.C. Yard Police, Bengaluru City, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120B and 506 read with Section 34 of IPC, subject to the following conditions:

¶41

Petitioner shall execute personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (One Lakh only) with two sureties for the likesum, to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

¶42

The petitioner shall appear regularly on all the dates of hearing before the Trial Court unless the Trial Court exempts his appearance for valid reasons;

¶43

The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly threaten or tamper with the prosecution witnesses;

¶44

The petitioner shall not involve in similar offences in future;

¶45

The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Trial Court without permission of the said Court until the case registered against him is disposed off.

¶46

SD/JUDGE

¶47

¶48

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13

Chetan @ Shivu @ Kariya Chetu v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chetan @ Shivu @ Kariya Chetu v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam Pasha Vs State of Karnataka

Manohar S @ Manu Vs State of Karnataka

Mukesh Darjee Vs State of Karnataka

Sri P Poorna Chandra Rao Vs State of Karnataka by

Kripa Vaibhav C Vs the State of Karnataka by

Sri. Nayaz @ Syed Nayaz Vs State by