Manikant v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court at Bangalore examined the records of multiple criminal petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC. The petitions sought quashing of FIRs and cognizance orders related to Essential Commodities Act offences.
What did the court decide?
Quashed the registration and issuing summons and orders for cognizance in five criminal proceedings.
What the court decided
- 1 -
�������������������
������������������������ ���������������������������� ������������������������ ������������������������ ������������������������
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200791 OF 2023
C/W
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200792 OF 2023 CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200794 OF 2023 CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 200795 OF 2023
AND
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the unjustifiable淬罚 orders of the lower court is injurious to the ends of justice, and thus liable to be quashed.
Whether the court below committed an error in inquiry and detection of the offence.
Whether the order complained of was passed arbitrarily or maliciously by the lower court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manikanth Rathod / Mahesh Guli
- respondent
The State
Coram
Hemant Chandangoudar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Karnataka HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRL.P/200794/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court