more than 6 months for steps and also for service of summons and execution of NBW and to furnish the process fee. But the complainant continuously remained absent. In spite of sufficient opportunity were given, the complainant continuously remained absent and failed to take steps. In spite of order, process also not paid continuously for several dates of hearing. No doubt it is true that the case should not be dismissed either for default or for non prosecution. But on the other hand, the case has to be decided on merits and the real controversy between the parties has to be adjudicated finally and effectively. But in this case, the complainant continuously remained absent. This shows that, the complainant is not interested in prosecuting this case. The proceedings of this nature is summary in nature as per Sec.143 of N.I.Act., which is required to be concluded in respect of trial within 6 months from the date of filing the complaint. But complainant continuously remained absent. Hence this court has no option, but to dismiss the complaint for non prosecution. Hence, complaint is dismissed for non prosecution."
