87. The accused No.1, 3, 4, 6 to 8, 11 to 13 and 16 were subjected to Brain Mapping and as per the report of the said examination, the accused No.1 is indicative and possession of knowledge about the activities listed in the process of Brain Mapping test of accused No.1. Further, the Brain Mapping test of above said other accused persons also indicate the involvement of those accused No.3, 4, 6 to 8 and 11 to 13 and 16 in the alleged incident. Further, during the investigation the Investigation Officer collected the copies of Bank statements in respect of the account of accused No.13, and the Bank accounts of her father B.M. Ramalingam. mother R. Kamala and sister Anitha R. As pee statement of Bank account of the father of accused No.13, the amount Rs.1,75,000/- was withdrawn from the account on 07.02.2006 i.e. about 5 days prior to the date of PGET 2006 and 4 days earlier to the date of alleged conspiracy held on 11.02.2006. As per the Bank account statement of mother of the accused No.13, the amount of Rs.1.50,000/- was withdrawn from the Bank account on 08.02.2006 and the amount of Rs.1,50,000/- was drawn from the account of the accused No.13 on the same day i.e. on 08.02.2006, which was 3 days prior to the date of alleged conspiracy taken place on 11.02.2006. Further, the statements of the employees of the concerned hotels recorded by the Investigating Officer during the investigation of the case clearly show that some of the candidates of the PGET 2006 who took exam at Bengaluru stayed at the concerned hotel on 11.02.2006 i.e. previous day of the PGET 2006.”
