Disposed

M/S Splendid Properties v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC26 May 2023CRL.P/1033/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court permitted withdrawal with liberty to file a fresh petition if a charge sheet is filed later.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the criminal petition permitted with liberty to file a fresh petition if a charge sheet is filed.

M/S Splendid Properties Vs State of Karnataka — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

1 - CRL.P No. 1033 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 26^TH DAY OF MAY, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1033 OF 2022

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

M/S SPLENDID PROPERTIES HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.1, 3^RD FLOOR, MAHAVEER TOWERS, 24^TH MAIN, J.P.NAGAR, 6^TH PHASE, BENGALURU – 560 078. REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI RAM MOHAN VORA.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI RADHANANDAN B. S., ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

STATE OF KARNATAKA STATE BY KADUGODI POLICE STATION BENGALURU – 560 067. REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BUILDING BENGALURU - 01.

¶13

SMT. KAMALABAI D/O LATE PAPPANNA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS RESIDING AT SEEGEHALLY BIDARAHALLI HOBLI BENGALURU EAST TALUK

¶14

¶15

CRL.P No. 1033 of 2022

¶16

KADUGODI, BENGALURU – 560 067.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

(BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R-1 AND SMT. SUNITHA H.SINGH, ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶19

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PCR NO.196/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE BENGALURU FOR OFFENCE P/U/S.406, 420, 468, 471 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AT ANNEXURE-A.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.

¶23

The memo reads as follows:

¶24

“The petitioner respectfully submits that the petitioner intends to withdraw the above petition since it is in the FIR stage. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition if the charge sheet is filed in this case, in the interest of justice.”

¶25

¶26

CRL.P No. 1033 of 2022

¶27

In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as

¶28

withdrawn.

¶29

Sd/JUDGE

¶30

NVJ List No.: 5 Sl No.: 5 CT:SS

M/S Splendid Properties v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Splendid Properties v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gurushree High Tech Multi Speciality Hospital Vs Commissioner for Health and Family Welfare and Chairman

Bhojaraj Vs Simon a

Sri. Hanumanthappa Vs the Assistant Executive Engineer

Vishwanath H M (Ex-M.L.a) Vs State of Karnataka

K.R.Divya Vs the State of Karnataka

Somalingappa Vs the State of Karnataka