Petitioner filed anticipatory bail petition under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. in a case under the Karnataka Forest Act, 1963. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2023:KHC-D:10160 CRL.P No. 101549 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101549 OF 2023 (438-)
BETWEEN:
SRI. GOPINATH S/O NARASIMHA NAYAK AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. MUDBHATKAL, BHATKAL, UTTARA KANANDA.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KINI NAGPRASAD SURESH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
CHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANI Digitally signed byCHANDRASHEKARLAXMANKATTIMANIDate: 2023.09.0814:59:59 +0530
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.GIRIJA S HIREMATH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 438 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO ALLOW PRESENT PETITION AND RELEASE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED ON ANTICIPATORY BAIL IN THE EVENT OF HIS ARREST, IF ANY IN ROR NO. 01/2023-24 REGISTERED BY THE FOREST RANGE OFFICER, BHATKAL FOR
NC: 2023:KHC-D:10160 CRL.P No. 101549 of 2023
ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 62, 80 AND 104-A OF THE KARNATAKA FOREST ACT, 1963.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo
seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
Memo is placed on record.
In the light of the same, petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
KGK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13
1 provisions across 1 enactments
GOPINATH S/O NARASIMHA NAYAK
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER, BHATKAL
J.M. KHAZI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
