Dismissed

Mahammaedahanif S/O Mehaboobsab Nadaf v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC21 Sept 2023CRL.P/100475/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of criminal proceedings at an advanced stage of trial (arguments) before the District and Sessions Judge. The High Court held that the petition would not be entertainable at this juncture.

What did the court decide?

Rejected the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal proceedings.

Mahammaedahanif S/O Mehaboobsab Nadaf Vs the State of… — Quashing and FIR | Karnataka HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2023:KHC-D:10987 CRL.P No. 100475 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 21^ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100475 OF 2023

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

MAHAMMAEDAHANIF S/O MEHABOOBSAB NADAF, AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. SOCIAL WORKER, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶8

MANJURALI MAHAMMADAHANIF NADAF, AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. LINEMAN, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶9

JANNABI W/O MAHAMMADAHANIF NADAF, AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶10

VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL

¶11

Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL

¶12

Date: 2023.09.22 10:49:57 +0530

¶13

ASMA D/O MAHAMMADHANIF NADAF, AGE. 23 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEKEEPER, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶14

NAHEEDA D/O MAHAMMADAHANIF NADAF, AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. MBA STUDENT, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶15

SEEMA D/O MAHAMMADHANIF NADAF, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. B. COM. STUDENT, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶16

SAJANA D/O MAHAMMADAHANIF NADAF, AGE. 29 YEARS, OCC. 9TH STD. STUDENT, R/O. TAVARAMELLIHALLI, TQ. SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶17

¶18

NC: 2023:KHC-D:10987 CRL.P No. 100475 of 2023

¶19

… PETITIONERS

¶20

(BY SRI. S.M. JATTI ,ADVOCATE)

¶21

AND:

¶22

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH BANKAPUR POLICE STATION, R/BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.

¶23

JAINABBI W/O CHAMANSAB NADAF, AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, AT TEVARMELLAHALLI, SAVANUR, DIST. HAVERI-581118.

¶24

… RESPONDENTS

¶25

(BY SRI. MADANMOHAN M. KHANNUR, AGA FOR R1; MISS. CHARULATA BAGEWADI FOR SRI. ARVIND D. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶26

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN S.C. NO.24/2018 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISAHBLE U/S 143, 147, 148, 114, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506 R/W SEC. 149 OF IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HAVERI, ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO. 45/2015 BANKAPUR P.S. SO FOR AS THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 4, 5, 16 TO 20 ARE CONCERNED BY ALLOWING THIS PETITION.

¶27

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶28

¶29

NC: 2023:KHC-D:10987 CRL.P No. 100475 of 2023

¶30

ORDER

¶31

The petitioners are before this Court calling in

¶32

question the proceedings in S.C. No.24/2018 registered

¶33

for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 114, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506 read with Section 149 of the IPC.

¶34

Heard the learned counsel Sri.Sabeel Ahmed appearing for the petitioner and the learned HCGP and Sri.Vijay K. Naik for the respondents.

¶35

The learned counsel appearing for the

¶36

complainant would seek to contend that the petition is preferred on 17.02.2023 at the stage when the S.C. No.24/2018 is set for arguments after the completion of the evidence. The learned counsel has placed on record the order sheet maintained before the concerned Court in S.C. No.24/2018.

¶37

In the light of the trial being at an advanced stage that too at the stage of arguments, the petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. would not, in the considered view of this Court, be entertainable.

¶38

¶39

NC: 2023:KHC-D:10987 CRL.P No. 100475 of 2023

¶40

Therefore, the petition stands rejected.

¶41

Sd/JUDGE

¶42

Rsh / ct:bck List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11

Mahammaedahanif S/O Mehaboobsab Nadaf v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahammaedahanif S/O Mehaboobsab Nadaf v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Rudragouda Patil Vs the Managing Director

Smt. Arati Suresh Hulikoppe Vs Shri. Vasantrao Ganapatro Deshmukh

Smt. Seeta D/O Kushappa Bajaguli Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Kaveri D/O Suryakant Tate Vs Smt Akshta W/O Sagar Tate

Ramesh S/O. Channamallappa Mallapur Vs the State of Karnataka

Rao v S Alias B v Rao S/O. B Madhusudan Vs the State of Karnataka