The High Court of Karnataka dismissed the petitioner's Civil Petition under Section 24 CPC for transfer, as the petition became infructuous upon the parties settling the matter by obtaining a divorce.
Civil petition dismissed as having become infructuous due to settlement via divorce.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP NO.142 OF 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR CIVIL PETITION NO. 142 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SMT. MANJULA V D/O VENKATESH, W/O T MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT 5TH CROSS HOSSALIYANATHOTA BATAWADI, TUMKUR CITY TUMKUR DISTRICT-572 103.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VIKYATH B, ADVOCATE)
AND:
T MANJUNATHA S/O THIMMAIAHA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT CHANNABYREANHALLI VILLAGE KALLUDIPOST, KASABA HOBLI GOWRIBIDANURU TALUK CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT-562 101.
…RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND THEREBY ORDER FOR TRANSFER M.C.NO.5 OF 2022 WHICH IS PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT GAURIBIDANUR TO THE PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT AT TUMKUR AND SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS COURTS DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE.
CP NO.142 OF 2022
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition stating that prayer made in the petition has become infructuous
as the parties have settled the matter by obtaining divorce.
Memo is placed on record.
Accordingly, the civil petition is dismissed as having
become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
SB
Smt. Manjula V
T Manjunatha
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
