This court dismissed the petitioner's petition seeking withdrawal and transfer of a mutual consent maintenance decree as the parties had reached a settlement before the Trial Court, rendering the petition infructuous.
The civil petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP No. 117 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR
CIVIL PETITION NO. 117 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GOPI G.A.., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VINUTHA M Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAJASHEKAR S., ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SEC.24 OF CPC, PRAYING TO WITHDRAW M.C.NO. 5099/2020 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BENGALURU AND TRANSFER THE SAME TO THE COURT OF THE
CP No. 117 of 2022
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, GUBBI FOR DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent, who are present before the Court, submit in unison that the matter between the parties namely the petitioner-wife and the respondent-husband has been amicably settled before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Gubbi in M.C.No.17/2003. The joint memo has already been filed to the said effect. In view of the same, the present civil petition does not survive for consideration.
2. Placing the submission of the learned counsel for
the parties and the memo on record, the civil petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/JUDGE
VM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16
Smt. M.L. Pruthvi
Raghuram S P
Pradeep Singh Yerur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
